Comparing Emotiona
Comparing Emotional
Maturity and Marital Satisfaction in Married Men Having Healthy and Unhealthy
Inference from their Family-of-Origin Employed in Tehran Oil Company
Azadeh Saffarpour1,
Mina Sharifi2
1. MA in Counseling, Shahid Beheshti University,
Tehran, Iran
2. MA in Psychology, Tehran University. Tehran,
Iran
Abstract: The
aim of this study was to analyze and compare the relationship between emotional
maturity and dyadic adjustment in people having healthy and unhealthy inference
from their family-of-origin. 240 individuals were selected to do this study
from among 681 individual married men working at Pipe Line Oil Co. of Tehran
using systematic random sampling. In this study, data obtained from,
family-of-origin scale, dyadic adjustment scale, and emotional maturity scale.
To analyze data the researcher used Z-test, Pearson correlation,
multi-dimensional linear regression and T-test with independent samples. In
this study, the researcher found that in two groups of samples having healthy
and unhealthy inference from their family-of-origin there was significant
relationships between the rates of 1. Emotional maturity and dyadic adjustment
2.The rate of emotional maturity and 3.Dyadic adjustment. The result of this
study shows that the first hypothesis is supported by 95% confident and second
and third hypothesis are by 99% confident at significant level of 0.0001. The
result of this study focuses on the role of family-of-origin in creating
emotional maturity and the quality of dyadic adjustment in people in the
adolescence and after marriage.
[Azadeh
Saffarpour, Mina Sharifi. Comparing Emotional Maturity and Marital
Satisfaction in Married Men Having Healthy and Unhealthy Inference from their
Family-of-Origin Employed in Tehran Oil Company. Life
Sci J 2013;10(7s):152-159] (ISSN:1097-8135). http://www.lifesciencesite.com. 25
Keywords: emotional
maturity, marital satisfaction, healthy inference, unhealthy inference.
